Archive for June, 2011

House Passes Patent Reform

Friday, June 24th, 2011

By Molly Kocialski The U.S. House approved H.R. 1249 strong bipartisan support. The Senate passed a similar measure, S. 23, in a 95-5 vote in March. The House bill approved yesterday has to be reconciled with the Senate version before it can be sent to the White House for President Obama’s signature. However, reconciliation is [...]

Pro Bono Steering Committee

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

The IP Section is spearheading the effort in bringing the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Pro Bono Initiative to Colorado. We are looking for one volunteer to serve on the steering committee, which is co-chaired by Ben Fernandez of Faegre & Benson and Nina Wang, which will begin meeting in July. If you are [...]

Programming Committee

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

The IP Section has established a programming committee to assist in the planning of programs for the IP Section, including the monthly lunches and other CLE events. This newly formed committee is chaired by Danny Sherwinter of Marsh, Fischmann & Breyfogle, and is looking for two committee members. If you are interested in serving on [...]

New IP Section Officer

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

Bayh-Dole Act does not Automatically Vest Title

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

By Donna Gonzales-Lin On June 6, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., affirming the Federal Circuit and holding that the “Bayh-Dole Act does not confer title to federally funded inventions on contractors or authorize contractors to unilaterally [...]

U.S. Supreme Court Pronounces New Standard of Willful Blindness for Induced Infringement

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

By Donna Gonzales-Lin On May 31, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., holding that induced infringement under § 271(b) requires knowledge that the induced acts constitute patent infringement. Specifically, and more importantly, the Court held that induced infringement requires at least a showing that the defendant [...]

The IP Section focuses on educational programs and the exchange of information about new or proposed developments in the intellectual property field. This field embraces patent, copyright and trademark matters as well as antitrust, trade secrets and unfair competition issues. The Section holds monthly luncheon meetings on topics in the field, bringing in national speakers.

Rimons twitter widget by Rimon Habib